|
SCOTT STARLING NATURE Sanctuary
How to get there - Google Maps
How to get there - Written Directions
How to get there
- Indy Parks pdf Map
(Eagle Creek Park North)
| Work Day Description:
Meeting Location:
Please meet and register in the Circle Drive of Starling Nature
Sanctuary. The written driving directions linked above will guide
you there.
Participants must wear clothes
appropriate for outdoor field work. Long pants and closed toe
shoes are required. Lunch, water, gloves, and equipment will be
provided.
|
View Larger Map
|
The Center for Earth and
Environmental Science and Indy Parks and Recreation have
conducted service learning work days within the Scott Starling
Nature Sanctuary since 1998. The principle goals
include the restoration of a series of ground water fed wetlands,
the reestablishment of a riparian forest, and the improvement of
native habitats through the removal of invasive exotic species.
top of page
Scott Starling Nature Sanctuary Background
Project Location, History and Setting
The Scott Starling Nature Sanctuary
is located at the north end of Eagle Creek Reservoir in Eagle
Creek Park. It is situated in Pike Township of northwest Marion
County on the Tipton Till Plain section of the Central Till
Plain Natural Region of Indiana.
The area was settled in the
mid-1800s. Nearly all of the land on the north side of Fishback
Creek was utilized for agricultural purposes during most of the
twentieth century. Aerial photographs from 1936 show several
areas that are now covered with young second growth forest were
in row crop (Tungsevick, 1997). The area was purchased by the
City of Indianapolis in 1966 as a portion of the land designated
for the developing Eagle Creek Park and Reservoir. Several
agricultural fields continued to be cultivated until 1991. The
area was officially dedicated as the Scott Starling Nature
Sanctuary in 1992 and is managed by Indy Parks and Recreation.
The physical setting of the
Nature Sanctuary is defined by Fishback Creek and the associated
stream valley. This deeply incised valley originated from
glacial meltwaters of the Wisconsin epoch when water flows were
significantly higher than those in the current stream (Barr et
al., 1996). The valley is characterized by a narrow floodplain
and steep bluffs on the south and west sides of the creek. A
broad floodplain with a gentle slope occupies areas north and
east of the creek. This is the area of the wetland restoration.
Glacial meltwater has left broad outwash deposits dominated by
permeable sand and gravel. These deposits are the source of
groundwater seeps on the preserve.
During pre-settlement times, the
majority of the Starling Sanctuary was forested and included
both upland and floodplain forests. A section of the property
likely contained an open sedge meadow. This area is located
around the groundwater seepage area and contains a deep muck
soil consistent with the presence of a saturated sedge meadow (Tungesvick,
1997). Prior to the initiation of restoration, the area
consisted of a small seepage along Wilson Road north of an
infrequently mowed grassy area. The area is sunny, but contains
abundant evidence of disturbance (Tungesvick, 1997).
Wetland Functions and
Benefits
Wetlands are a part of our
natural heritage. They provide many vital physical, ecological,
and economic functions and benefits. These benefits and
functions can generally be classified as water resource related,
biological and ecological, aesthetic, educational, recreational
and economic. Water resource functions and benefits include
flood control, water quality and groundwater discharge and
recharge (DNR, 1996). Biological and ecological functions and
benefits include habitat and resources for fisheries, wildlife
and plants. About 900 species of vertebrate animals require
wetlands at some time in their lives. Wetlands provide the
principal habitat for virtually all species of waterfowl
nationwide, and also for many other birds, mammals and reptiles.
In Indiana, 11 species of waterfowl use wetlands for nesting,
and 28 species use wetlands as migration/wintering habitat (DNR,
1996). Nationwide, nearly 35 percent of all rare and endangered
animal species depend on wetlands for survival, although
wetlands constitute only 5 percent of the nations lands (DNR,
1996). More than 60 wetland-dependent animal species are listed
as endangered, threatened, or of special concern in Indiana. A
great variety of plants thrive in wetlands and many are wholly
dependent on wetland habitats. Because so many wetlands have
been lost or degraded, there are more than 120 species of
wetland plants in Indiana that are endangered, threatened or
rare (DNR, 1996; Bennet et al., 1995).
top of page
Habitat
Change and Wetland Loss in Indiana and Marion County
Prior to European settlement,
approximately 99 percent of Marion County was comprised of
closed canopy forest (Barr et al., 2002). The remainder of the
county consisted of wetland plant communities and included fens,
bogs, sedge meadows, wet prairies, swamps and marshes (Hedge,
1997). A fen is a type of wetland that receives mineral-rich
(calcareous) inputs of groundwater (Thompson and Luthin, 2000).
They are dominated by sedges and other grass-like vegetation
typically with tall shrub borders. These systems have very slow
flowing water in which the water level fluctuates seasonally (DNR,
1996). Sedge meadows are sedge-dominated wetlands of stream
margins or floodplains. The substrate is typically highly
organic, and is at or just above the water level (DNR, 1996).
After settlement, most of these
forest and wetland plant communities were cleared, drained and
converted for agricultural use or other development. Wetland
drainage most commonly consisted of the installation of a
subsurface tile drainage network. These tiles were typically
fired clay and were designed to move water through an
underground plumbing system to an outflow point, typically a
creek or artificial ditch.
Fragments of Marion County’s
original forest were allowed to grow back for timber harvesting
or because the soils were unsuitable for farming or other
development. These forest fragments make up most of the
remaining hardwood forests of Marion County and in 1997
accounted for only 13% of the county (Barr et al., 2002).
Indiana’s wetlands fared poorly.
The best estimate of the wetlands in Indiana prior to settlement
is based on the presence of wetland (hydric) soils. Analysis of
soil data statewide by the Natural Resources Conservation
Service and Indiana Department of Natural Resources concluded
there were approximately 5.6 million acres of wetlands in
Indiana circa the 1780’s representing 24% of the state’s surface
area (DNR, 1996). Surveys completed during the 1980’s concluded
that there are 813,000 wetland acres today accounting for only
3.5% of the surface area of the state (DNR, 1996). These
estimates indicate that Indiana has lost 85% of its wetlands and
ranks 4th (tied with Missouri) among the 50 states in
proportion of wetland acreage lost (Dahl, 1990). The vast
majority of the 85% of the wetlands lost was due to drainage for
agricultural purposes (DNR, 1996).
The current distribution of
wetland types in Indiana heavily favors forest wetlands with 62%
of the remaining wetlands being of this type. Fen wetlands and
sedge meadows are classified within the “other” category along
with bogs and together combine only 3% of the remaining wetland
types statewide (Rolley, 1991). Northeastern and southwestern
Indiana have the greatest proportion of remaining wetlands with
several counties retaining wetland acreage of 10-15% of the
county acreage. Marion County has retained only 3-6% of its
acreage as wetland.
Indiana’s wetlands continue to
be lost or impacted in a variety of ways. Comprehensive data for
the current extent and causes of wetland loss are largely
unavailable. Recent Supreme Court rulings have significantly
reduced wetland protection, especially for small, isolated
wetlands. The State of Indiana is currently debating the future
of wetland protection and several wetland protection bills are
currently before the Indiana legislature (HB1221 and SB491). The
future status of wetland protection in Indiana is uncertain at
this time.
References Cited
- Barr, R.C., Hall, B.E., and
Jewett, D.G., 1996. The Evolution of Fishback Creek Watershed.
Hydrology Laboratory, Department of Geology,
IUPUI.
- Barr, R.C., Hall, B.E.,
Wilson, J.S., Souch, C., Lindsey, G., Bacone, J.A., Campbell,
R.K., and Tedesco, L.P., 2002, Documenting changes in the
natural environment of Indianapolis-Marion County between the
time of European settlement (ca. 1820) and the present:
Ecological Restoration, v. 20, p. 37-46.
- Bennet, J., McElfish, J.,
Bale, A., and Fischman, R., 1995. Indiana’s Biological
Diversity: Strategies and Tools for Conservation.
Environmental Law Insititue, Washington, D.C., 78 pp.
- Department of Natural
Resources, 1996. Indiana Wetlands Conservation Plan, 75 p.
- Rolley, R.E., 1991. Indiana’s
Wetland Inventory. Indiana Wildlife Management and Research
Notes, No. 532, 6 pp.
- Thompson, A.L., and Luthin,
C.S., 2000. Wetland Restoration Handbook for Wisconsin
Landowners, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Publication # SS-944-00, 108 p.
- Tungesvick, K., 1997. Floral
Inventory of Scott Starling Nature Sanctuary.
Follow the research links to the
left to learn more about wetlands.
top of page
Educational Note:
Reference the IUPUI
Center for Earth and Environmental Science when citing
material from this website. To learn more about citation
and plagiarism visit:
University Library
General Reference Resources:
http://www.ulib.iupui.edu/genref
IUPUI Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and
Conduct:
http://www.iupui.edu/~sldweb/rights/ top of page |